Opposition African Democratic Congress has rejected claims by the Presidency that former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s proposal to reduce petrol prices to about N600 per litre amounts to a return to Nigeria’s old fuel subsidy regime.
ADC said Atiku’s proposal was instead a controlled production incentive for domestic refineries, designed to lower the cost of petrol while strengthening local refining capacity.
National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, stated this in response to Presidency’s criticism of the proposal.
He said, “The Presidency has based its argument on a projected N19.1 trillion cost without properly considering how Atiku’s proposal is structured or the wider economic benefits of cheaper fuel produced locally.
“We are at a loss how the presidency conjured up this phantom figure. But we do not agree with it,”
The ADC spokesperson explained that Atiku’s plan would have a fiscal limit and mechanisms for monitoring the movement of crude from refinery intake to finished petroleum products.
The party argued that the Presidency was criticising the old subsidy system rather than Atiku’s proposed controlled subsidy plan, which it said was intended to replace it.
ADC also questioned the government’s justification for providing incentives to oil producers while rejecting measures aimed at reducing the burden of high fuel prices on Nigerians.
Abdullahi referred to offshore oil production incentives that can reach $11.50 per barrel, asking why a similar, controlled incentive for domestic refineries should be considered unacceptable.
“If Nigeria can provide a production-linked fiscal incentive of up to $11.50 per barrel to stimulate offshore oil production, why is a carefully controlled crude-input incentive for domestic refineries dismissed as economic madness when its objective is to make fuel cheaper for Nigerians and build domestic refining capacity?” he asked.
The ADC further argued that the cost of maintaining high petrol prices should also be considered when assessing Atiku’s proposal.
It said expensive petrol had contributed to higher transportation costs, food prices, production expenses and the wider cost-of-living crisis.
The party maintained that its proposal would be capped, audited and traceable, while potentially reducing petroleum imports, saving foreign exchange and supporting domestic refining.
